Project Motion

Editorial review at Project Motion

This page explains who is responsible for Project Motion content, what review has actually happened and how to question or correct our work.

Current review model: Editorial review. Project Motion does not claim a standing medical-review process.
Last updated: July 17, 2026

Who creates the content

The Project Motion editorial team researches, writes and maintains the site's movement, evidence and product information for women 50+. The team is responsible for using current sources, keeping the audience description accurate and removing unsupported claims.

What “reviewed” means here

Every page should identify its actual level of review. Editorial review means the structure, sources, clarity, claims and visible product facts were checked by Project Motion. It does not mean that a physician, dietitian, physical therapist or other clinician approved the page.

If an external qualified professional reviews a page in the future, that page will name the reviewer, list only relevant verifiable qualifications, explain the scope of the review and show the review date. We will not apply a generic “medically reviewed” badge across content that person did not review.

Our review responsibilities

  • Use current, directly relevant sources and link to them in visible HTML.
  • Distinguish general education from individual medical advice or rehabilitation.
  • Separate public-health guidance, ingredient research and finished-product evidence.
  • Check the likely overall message created by copy, visuals, calls to action and nearby products.
  • Show publication or update dates on health and evidence pages.
  • Correct material errors and remove unresolved product facts.

Commercial interests

Project Motion is a commercial project and may sell the products discussed on the site. That relationship should be clear. Product links do not turn ingredient research into product proof, and a sales goal does not justify stronger health language.

Corrections and questions

Email fab50s.dash@gmail.com with the page URL, the statement in question and any source you think we should review. Material corrections should be reflected on the page with a new update date.

Read the full Project Motion evidence method.